Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement and accompanying image provide an analysis of the impact of a debate on the net favorable views of two political candidates, Tim Walz and JD Vance. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues and contributes to civic dialogue by informing viewers about the public perception of the candidates.
- The statement and image strive to do no harm by presenting factual data from a poll, which is a neutral and informative approach. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement and image promote understanding by providing clear and concise information about the change in public perception of the candidates after the debate. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement and image engage in constructive dialogue by focusing on the data and not engaging in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments against the candidates. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement and image use their platform responsibly by presenting factual information that can help viewers make informed decisions about the candidates. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.