In reply to:
Chaz Rolfer
@ring_collin
·
81d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
81d
The statement by @ring_collin constitutes public discourse as it engages with a substantive public issue—campaign finance reform—and suggests a specific policy solution, namely, a Constitutional Amendment for public funding of federal campaigns.
- The statement does not cause harm with words or actions. It proposes a constructive solution to a public issue. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by suggesting a solution aimed at reducing the influence of money in politics, which is a concern for many citizens. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a previous comment with a policy suggestion rather than a personal attack. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a societal improvement, specifically in the realm of campaign finance reform. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a significant public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.