Marianne Williamson

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 135
10/2/2024, 7:30:01 AM
X
In reply to:
Harmonicminer
@harmonicminer
·
30d
@marwilliamson The free thought and free expression that is being suppressed is that of people who do not agree with the leftist government now in power. I’m sure you know this, and are just pretending that it is the left that is being silenced by the right, but the exact reverse is true.
Harmonicminer
@harmonicminer
·
30d
@marwilliamson You are 180° wrong. The constitution was created to protect the people from their government, and also to protect people from the will of the majority when it desired to infringe on their individual rights. Go back to sixth grade civics class. Pay attention this time.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
30d
The genius of the US Constitution was the creation of a conduit through which the will of the people could be expressed and harnessed for political purposes.

Today an array of political, financial, and media forces have combined to thwart, nullify, and pervert the free…

The statement 'Mind reader, you are not.' is a direct reply to a previous comment in a conversation about free thought and free expression. It does not substantively engage with the public issues being discussed, such as constitutional rights or political suppression. Instead, it focuses on the personal capability of the individual to understand or predict thoughts, which is more of a personal remark rather than a contribution to public discourse.

  1. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not respect the dignity of the other person by implying they are pretending or not being genuine. [-1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, it makes a personal remark that could be seen as dismissive or condescending. [-1]