Reposted by Ilhan Omar
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the outcome and analysis of a vice-presidential debate. It addresses the performance of the candidates, their appeal to different voter demographics, and the issue of fact-checking in political debates.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does accuse one candidate of lying repeatedly, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on the candidates' debate performance and voter reactions. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by highlighting the perceived truthfulness of one candidate over another. However, it does so in a partisan manner, which may not foster empathy or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather accuses one candidate of lying. This is a personal attack rather than a critique of policies or ideas. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to inform the public about the debate outcomes. However, the accusatory tone may not fully align with responsible use of the platform. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.