The statement addresses a public issue by questioning the legitimacy of a practice by OpenAI and tagging the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which is a public regulatory body. The tone is inquisitive and somewhat critical, aiming to provoke a discussion about the confidence OpenAI has in its product.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It raises a question and expresses skepticism without using harmful language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement could promote understanding by encouraging a discussion about the practices of OpenAI. However, it does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the actions of OpenAI and seeking clarification from the FTC. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by addressing a public concern and seeking regulatory input. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.