Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of perceived political bias in social media enforcement policies. It references empirical research to discuss the complexity of the issue, suggesting that while conservatives are suspended more often, they also share more misinformation. The tone is analytical and aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the topic.
- The statement strives to do no harm by presenting empirical evidence and avoiding inflammatory language. It aims to clarify a contentious issue rather than exacerbate it. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging the complexity of the issue and providing data to support its claims. It does not engage in name-calling or derogatory remarks. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by presenting research findings and encouraging readers to consider the data. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to contribute to the betterment of society by providing a well-researched perspective on a contentious issue, thereby fostering informed public discourse. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.