Robert Costa

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 118

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue, namely the legal proceedings involving a former president. It provides information about a judicial motion related to presidential immunity, which is a matter of public concern.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It simply reports on a legal development and provides a link to the document for public access. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on a public legal matter and not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by providing access to a legal document that is relevant to public discourse. However, it does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a straightforward report of a legal development. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by sharing information that is relevant to public interest and civic dialogue. [+1]