Marianne Williamson

Rank 10 of 47
|
Score 165
10/2/2024, 11:51:55 PM
X
In reply to:
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
86d
@RickFernandes90 The blood that was spilled was by the oppressor against the oppressed, not by the oppressed against anyone . That non-violence on the part of the movement is what aroused the conscience of the country and paved the way for success to happen.
seabiscuit90
@RickFernandes90
·
86d
@marwilliamson The Civil Rights movement was not nonviolent and elegant in anyway. Much blood was shed, may be not in the same capacity as the Civil War, but it was shed nonetheless resulting in Kings murder.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
86d
@RickFernandes90 The Indian Independence movement (Gandhi). The Civil Rights movement (King).
seabiscuit90
@RickFernandes90
·
87d
@marwilliamson With respect, when in the course of history has freedom and liberty been achieved, as you say, “elegantly” and “nonviolent”?
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
87d
The genius of the US Constitution was the creation of a conduit through which the will of the people could be expressed and harnessed for political purposes.

Today an array of political, financial, and media forces have combined to thwart, nullify, and pervert the free…

The statement by @marwilliamson and the subsequent replies constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive discussion about the nature of historical movements, specifically the Civil Rights movement, and their methods of achieving change. The conversation addresses public issues related to history, non-violence, and social justice.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement by @marwilliamson and the reply by @RickFernandes90 strive to do no harm by focusing on historical facts and interpretations rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The conversation promotes understanding by referencing historical figures and suggesting reading material to gain a deeper understanding of the Civil Rights movement. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The dialogue remains constructive, with @marwilliamson and @RickFernandes90 engaging in a respectful exchange of differing viewpoints without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]