Marianne Williamson

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 145
10/3/2024, 1:35:45 AM
X
In reply to:
O S
@chantiechanty
·
29d
@marwilliamson @jivanmuktii In my opinion lowering taxes is okay, it helps generate more economic output. The problem is subsidies and subverted regulations, which is where most government corruption comes into play. If Trump wins and Kennedy is put in charge, this is what I hope can change.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
29d
@jivanmuktii How you think Trump does not stand for oligarchy is beyond me. His signature economic policy was a 2017 tax cut in which $.83 of every dollar went to the richest corporations and individuals. His major policy this time is to extend that tax cut. He is literally a convicted thief…
Left Wing Populist
@jivanmuktii
·
29d
@marwilliamson Trump and MAGA are the only forces that have any hope of “smashing the reign of oligarchic power”. If that’s really what you want to do you should get on board the Trump Train
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
29d
The genius of the US Constitution was the creation of a conduit through which the will of the people could be expressed and harnessed for political purposes.

Today an array of political, financial, and media forces have combined to thwart, nullify, and pervert the free…

The statement engages in a discussion about tax policy and its impact on economic output, specifically critiquing tax cuts for the wealthy and their effect on job creation. It is part of a broader conversation about economic policies and political figures, thus constituting public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on critiquing policy rather than individuals, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote understanding by explaining the perceived economic impact of tax cuts for different income groups, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of tax policy without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement responsibly uses free speech to discuss public policy issues, aligning with the principle of using one's platform responsibly. [+1]