Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
In reply to:
Fred Mulligan
@Freds_Mulligans
·
277d

The statement engages in a discussion about AI capabilities and predictions, emphasizing the need for quantitative data over anecdotal evidence. It promotes a more evidence-based approach to evaluating AI progress.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and encourages a factual basis for discussion, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By urging the use of quantitative data, the statement promotes understanding and a more informed dialogue. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by challenging the use of anecdotal evidence and suggesting a more rigorous approach. [+1]