Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
In reply to:
Paul Calcraft
@paul_cal
·
281d

The statement engages in a discussion about investment strategies and company valuations, specifically regarding OpenAI. It critiques investors' decisions and suggests a revision of valuation estimates, implying skepticism about maintaining high valuations through financial maneuvers like clawbacks.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses dismissive language ('dumber than I thought') which could be seen as harmful or disrespectful, violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it involves name-calling and a lack of respect for differing investment strategies. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and instead resorts to personal attacks, failing to promote a respectful dialogue. [-1]