The statement and accompanying image suggest that OpenAI is attempting to influence investor decisions regarding certain AI startups. The tone is critical, implying fear or insecurity on OpenAI's part. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with issues of corporate influence and competition in the tech industry.
- The statement does not directly harm but implies negative motives, which could be seen as harmful to OpenAI's reputation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but could be seen as undermining dignity by suggesting fearfulness. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses a provocative tone. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.