Gary Marcus

Rank 20 of 47
|
Score 56
10/3/2024, 7:52:10 PM
X
In reply to:
Ed Newton-Rex
@ednewtonrex
·
290d
@GaryMarcus Wait, but they say they are developing AI responsibly
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
290d
The AI company that appears to be least ethical is arguably the most powerful, with almost no constraint on the CEO, internally or externally.

This will likely end badly, for all of us.
David Sacks
@DavidSacks
·
291d
Shady. The mask is really coming off.

The statement and conversation engage in public discourse by discussing ethical concerns and business practices in the AI industry, specifically regarding OpenAI's influence and actions. The tone is critical and raises questions about corporate ethics and responsibility.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises concerns about potential harm due to lack of constraints on AI company leadership, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation respects privacy but uses strong language ('shady') that could be seen as disrespectful, slightly violating the principle of respecting dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by highlighting ethical concerns, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation engages in criticism of AI companies, which is constructive but borders on personal attack, slightly violating the principle of avoiding ad hominem arguments. [-1]