Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement reports on a public issue involving media ethics and transparency in journalism, specifically regarding the financial demands for an interview with a public figure's book publisher. It highlights a potential miscommunication and raises questions about the integrity of such practices.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm; it reports on a factual event. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by focusing on the actions of the publisher rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by shedding light on the unusual practice of charging for interviews, which can inform public discourse on media ethics. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather reports on the situation, allowing for constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By reporting on this issue, the statement uses its influence to potentially improve transparency and ethical standards in media practices. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly reporting on a matter of public interest. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.