The statement critiques the allocation of FBI resources, suggesting a misprioritization of efforts. It questions the decision to focus on misdemeanor offenses related to January 6th instead of more severe crimes like child exploitation. The tone is critical and implies a disagreement with current law enforcement priorities.
- The statement does not directly harm but implies criticism of resource allocation, which could be seen as constructive if aimed at improving priorities.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on criticism without offering solutions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, potentially leading to polarization. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.