Matt Taibbi

Rank 31 of 47
|
Score -20
10/3/2024, 11:48:58 PM
X
In reply to:
Pat A.
@pataz1
·
24d
@mtaibbi Yes.

Unless you think people should be able to violently attack the nation’s capitol building with impunity, Matt?
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
24d
That was an interview of an FBI agent pulled off investigating child exploitation cases to pursue misdemeanor J6 offenses. That sounds like a good use of resources to you?
Christophe
@Reid_Rothschild
·
24d
@skankskin_j @walterkirn @_waterman @mtaibbi @ggreenwald I’m actually paying Matt who follows me.
I’m going to have to reconsider that.
Matt WAS a great reporter as was Greenwald.

Now we get Matt playing down 1/6, being an apologist for some British scumbag doctor, and Greenwald lying about @GenFlynn’s guilt.

The statement is part of a broader discussion about the January 6th Capitol events and the allocation of FBI resources. It questions the severity of actions taken by individuals involved and critiques the prioritization of investigations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not promote harm but rather questions the actions and priorities of law enforcement. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and does not engage in hate speech, but it could be seen as dismissive of the seriousness of the events.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue but could be perceived as minimizing the events, which might not foster constructive criticism. [-1]