Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement refers to the use of American-supplied military equipment in a conflict, which is a substantive engagement with public issues related to foreign policy and military involvement. The tone suggests a critical stance on the role of American military support in the conflict.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of military actions, which could be seen as promoting awareness of potential harm caused by such actions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and respects privacy and dignity.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it raises awareness of a serious issue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on the issue of military support.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight a significant public issue, potentially contributing to societal betterment by encouraging discourse on military involvement. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly addressing a public concern. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.