Jill Stien

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score 44

The statement makes a provocative comparison between Democrats and Nazis, which is a highly charged and potentially harmful analogy. It appears to be part of a promotional activity for a video, but it does engage with public discourse by making a political statement.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses a harmful analogy that could be considered offensive and inflammatory, violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The comparison to Nazis could be seen as disrespectful and potentially hateful, violating the principle of respecting the dignity of others. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses a divisive and extreme analogy. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead using a provocative comparison that could be seen as a personal attack on a group of people. [-2]