Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement questions the effectiveness of GPT plugins, particularly in performing arithmetic tasks, suggesting skepticism about their success. It raises a valid concern about the functionality of AI tools, which is a topic of public interest.
- The statement does not cause harm but raises a concern about the effectiveness of a technology.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the functionality of GPT plugins. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.