Marianne Williamson

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 141

The statement critiques government spending priorities, highlighting a perceived imbalance between military expenditure and humanitarian aid. It engages with public issues related to budget allocation and societal values.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but raises a critical issue about spending priorities, which can be seen as a constructive critique.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the disparity in spending priorities, encouraging empathy for those in need of aid. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of government policies without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By questioning spending priorities, the statement uses influence to advocate for societal betterment. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement responsibly uses free speech to address a public concern about budget allocation. [+1]