In reply to:
Joel
@joelcardwellX
·
22d
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
22d
The statement engages in a discussion about the ethics of publishing sensitive information, specifically addressing the concept of doxing and the public availability of information. It is part of a broader conversation about the suppression of certain documents and the ethical considerations involved, which are relevant public issues.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but discusses the potential harm of publishing sensitive information, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy by opposing the publication of sensitive information like SSNs, aligning with the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the distinction between public information and doxing, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue without personal attacks, aligning with the principle of constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.