Matt Taibbi

Rank 32 of 47

Score -21

@FrAilty_8 Yes but that wasn’t in a tweet - it was on Substack. I don’t think an account should be suspended if no actual rules have been broken on the account itself

10/4/2024, 2:29:56 PM

In reply to:

Boss Install

@FrAilty_8

22d

@mtaibbi I thought the issue was it had his unredacted social security number and address

Matt Taibbi

@mtaibbi

22d

Not sure what you mean. I said the Vance material should not have been suppressed.

Joel

@joelcardwellX

22d

@mtaibbi There's nothing that was in the Vance dossier that wasn't in other publically available material.

Why have you become so transparently a @GOP shill?

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the suspension of an account related to the publication of sensitive information, touching on issues of free speech and platform policies.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not directly cause harm but discusses the implications of account suspension.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
It respects privacy by not disclosing sensitive information itself, but it comments on the handling of such information.
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
The statement questions platform actions, potentially advocating for transparency and fairness. [+1]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
It upholds free speech by arguing against suspension without rule violations. [+1]