Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement uses the term 'incredible grift' to describe the situation, suggesting a critical view of the endorsement and sale of Bibles that meet specific criteria set by an educational authority. The tone is skeptical and implies a potential conflict of interest or exploitation for profit.
- The statement implies harm by suggesting unethical behavior, but it does not directly cause harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but questions the dignity of those involved by implying exploitation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses a dismissive term. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.