Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement criticizes Israel for allegedly attacking healthcare facilities and compares these actions to those of Putin and Assad, suggesting a serious violation of international norms. The tone is accusatory and aims to highlight perceived injustices in conflict zones.
- The statement could be seen as doing harm by potentially inflaming tensions without providing evidence or context. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does make serious accusations against a nation, which could impact the dignity of those associated with it.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on condemnation without offering solutions or dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a direct comparison to other leaders without engaging in a nuanced discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to bring attention to a serious issue, but it does so in a way that may not contribute positively to societal discourse.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but may not do so responsibly, as it lacks context and could contribute to polarization. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.