The statement expresses a political opinion comparing Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, suggesting support for Harris as a preferable option. It links to a blog post by Andrew Yang, which likely elaborates on this viewpoint.
- The statement does not use harmful language and presents a political preference without derogatory remarks. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by expressing a clear political stance and encouraging consideration of future prospects. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on a preference for one candidate over another. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the author's influence to advocate for a political choice they believe benefits society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly sharing a political opinion. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.