Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 96

The statement critiques the ambitious revenue projections for Twitter, comparing them to overestimates in the AI space. It questions the realism of such forecasts, implying skepticism about their feasibility.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm but questions the credibility of financial projections, which can be seen as a form of constructive skepticism.
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in critique without personal attacks, focusing on the projections rather than individuals. [+1]