Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47

Score 90

@davecraige Um no. One recent study suggest they need human intervention every 13 miles on average, another said 100 miles. Neither is remotely close to “drive themselves”

10/5/2024, 8:53:58 PM

In reply to:

Dave Craige

@davecraige

358d

@GaryMarcus what exactly doesn’t work though? Tesla’s can basically drive themselves now.

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

359d

🧵👇Waymo seems to have come to the same conclusions I have.

If they are right, Tesla’s “FSD” is *never* going to work reliably in a fully autonomous way.

Ollie

@OllieAutonomy

359d

Did you know that @Waymo already had an AI model in 2018, loosely similar to Tesla's FSD? Why don't we see this today?
A thread 🧵

The statement engages in a public discourse about the capabilities and limitations of Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) technology, which is a topic of public interest and debate regarding the future of autonomous vehicles.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on providing factual information, thus adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by providing data to counter a claim, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement contributes to the discourse on autonomous vehicle technology, using the platform responsibly to share information and challenge claims. [+1]