Secretary Antony Blinken
@SecBlinken
·
21d
The statement is accusatory and challenges the integrity of a public official, suggesting that they lied about aid not being blocked by the government of Israel. It also calls for adherence to U.S. laws regarding military aid, implying concern for potential war crimes. The tone is confrontational and skeptical, focusing on accountability and legal compliance.
- The statement does not directly harm with words but implies wrongdoing, which could be seen as harmful if unfounded. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does challenge the dignity of the public official by accusing them of lying.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is accusatory and lacks a collaborative tone. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, as it is accusatory in nature.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to call for adherence to laws and accountability, which can be seen as aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be more responsible by providing evidence or engaging in dialogue.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.