The statement by Andrew Yang constitutes public discourse as it engages with the public issue of electoral reform, specifically advocating for ranked choice voting to address the problem of spoilers in elections. The tone is assertive and calls for action, aiming to influence public opinion and policy.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on a constructive proposal, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by addressing a systemic issue in the electoral process and suggesting a solution that could lead to fairer outcomes. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by proposing ranked choice voting as a solution, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the influence of the speaker to advocate for societal betterment through electoral reform. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using the platform to discuss a public issue with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.