Scott C. Smith
@WaterWarriorOne
·
222d
The statement raises concerns about environmental safety and regulatory oversight, suggesting that the EPA is not conducting independent testing and is instead allowing Biolabs to self-regulate. It references a specific incident in Conyers, Georgia, and draws a parallel to a previous event in East Palestine, implying potential negligence or lack of accountability.
- The statement aims to highlight potential harm due to lack of oversight, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity, focusing on institutional actions rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes awareness and understanding of environmental issues, encouraging public scrutiny. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism of the EPA, avoiding personal attacks and focusing on policy critique. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.