Robert Kennedy Jr

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 82

The statement is a political critique of a policy associated with Kamala Harris, suggesting it negatively impacts health, the environment, and taxpayer money. It also serves as a call to action for political change, advocating for the return of Donald Trump to the presidency and the speaker's own election to Washington. The tone is critical and partisan, aiming to rally support against the current policy and administration.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language like 'scam' and 'boondoggle,' which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use derogatory language that could undermine the dignity of those it criticizes. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is primarily focused on criticism and political advocacy. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses charged language and does not provide a detailed argument or evidence for its claims. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to advocate for political change, which could be seen as an attempt to better society from the speaker's perspective, but it does so in a divisive manner.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be considered responsible or with integrity, given the lack of constructive dialogue and the use of inflammatory language. [-1]