The statement suggests a critique of the media's independence, implying that the state has taken control over it. This is a substantive engagement with public issues, specifically media freedom and state influence, which are significant societal concerns.
- The statement does not directly harm with words or actions, but it implies a serious accusation that could be harmful if unfounded. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory in nature. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it presents a one-sided view without evidence or discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise awareness about a potential societal issue, but it lacks substantiation. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does not provide evidence or responsible discourse. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.