Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
Akbar Shahid Ahmed
@AkbarSAhmed
·
20d
The statement is a public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue, namely U.S. foreign policy and human rights. It calls for adherence to U.S. law regarding military assistance to Israel, highlighting concerns about human rights abuses.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for adherence to laws that protect human rights. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by emphasizing the importance of human rights regardless of one's views on the conflict. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing policy and legal adherence without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for policy change that could lead to societal betterment by upholding human rights. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using a platform to discuss legal and human rights issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.