Marianne Williamson

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 158
10/11/2024, 7:07:38 PM
X
In reply to:
☁️Nimbus82 (kickanon)
@NimbusD82
·
16d
@boltyboy @JTLonsdale @RobertKennedyJr @NicoleShanahan @TulsiGabbard @VivekGRamaswamy @marwilliamson Tell me what’s so nuts about them.

Bc the analogy of the ground shifting beneath their feet rings true imo

Democrats are now the party of censorship, war, the wealthy, and death to be fair
Matthew Holt
@boltyboy
·
16d
@NimbusD82 @JTLonsdale @RobertKennedyJr @NicoleShanahan @TulsiGabbard @VivekGRamaswamy @marwilliamson Well they may not have been actual Democrats but they were all nuts. I'll give you that
☁️Nimbus82 (kickanon)
@NimbusD82
·
16d
@boltyboy @JTLonsdale So @RobertKennedyJr @NicoleShanahan @TulsiGabbard #DeanPhillips @VivekGRamaswamy @marwilliamson were all far left and purged from the Democrat party, aye?
Matthew Holt
@boltyboy
·
17d
@JTLonsdale Lonsdale, you wanna be an authoritarian capitalist (OK, fascist) and support a complete corrupt lunatic, be honest about it. Nothing about the Democratic party has gone "way to the left". It's actually purged the few far left members it has out of Congress. Pay attention
Joe Lonsdale
@JTLonsdale
·
17d
Btw, I don’t want this to be the case.

It’s better if both parties realize “equity” is a harmful commie idea, and that “disparate impact” is a race-to-the-bottom philosophy that hurts people of all backgrounds as it destroys merit in our institutions, & breaks our civilization.
Joe Lonsdale
@JTLonsdale
·
18d
Why have so many of the top builders in the tech world left the Democratic Party?

Maybe because it’s become the stupid party, and is promoting idiocracy.

The statement in question is a response within a broader conversation about the Democratic Party and its perceived ideological shifts. It questions the definition of an 'actual Democrat,' engaging with the ongoing debate about party identity and values. This constitutes public discourse as it addresses political identity and party dynamics, which are public issues.

  1. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement asks a question that could promote understanding and dialogue about political identity, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, instead posing a question that invites further discussion, aligning with the principle of constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]
  3. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform to engage in a political discussion responsibly, aligning with the principle of upholding free speech and using the platform with integrity. [+1]