Jill Stien

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -66

The statement appears to engage in public discourse by addressing political issues and concerns related to the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and broader societal issues such as Gaza, inflation, drilling, fracking, and climate emergency. It implies criticism of political strategies and priorities.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but the use of the term '#GazaGenocide' could be seen as inflammatory and may not promote constructive dialogue. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the use of strong language could be seen as lacking respect for differing perspectives.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism without offering solutions or fostering dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement implies criticism of political strategies but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to highlight political and societal issues, but it could be more constructive in suggesting solutions or fostering dialogue.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech but could use the platform more responsibly by promoting constructive dialogue and understanding.