Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses the emotional dynamics involved in resistance movements, emphasizing the importance of channeling emotions constructively. It suggests that outrage, rather than blind rage, is more effective in promoting freedom and solidarity. The tone is reflective and aims to guide individuals towards a more productive form of activism.
- The statement promotes the idea of doing no harm by advocating for constructive emotions over destructive rage. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It encourages understanding, empathy, and compassion by suggesting that love and solidarity are more effective than hatred. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement implicitly engages in constructive dialogue by advising against personal attacks and blind rage, promoting a more thoughtful approach to resistance. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.