Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement critiques Kamala Harris's campaign strategy, suggesting it targets neoconservatives rather than progressives or Democrats. It expresses frustration over being expected to support a platform perceived as unpopular, under the threat of a Trump presidency. The tone is critical and challenges the political strategy, engaging in public discourse about electoral politics and voter expectations.
- The statement does not use harmful language but is critical of a political strategy, which is a legitimate part of public discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on criticism without offering constructive alternatives. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of a political strategy but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech responsibly by engaging in political critique, which is a fundamental aspect of democratic discourse. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.