Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a critique of the Democratic Party's policies from the perspective of a Green Party supporter, focusing on environmental issues and urging a vote for the Green Party.
- The statement uses strong language like 'genocide' which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the use of the term 'genocide' could be seen as disrespectful to those affected by actual genocides. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more accusatory and divisive. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses strong language and does not offer a platform for discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for the Green Party, which could be seen as an attempt to better society through environmental policies. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to the use of inflammatory language. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.