The statement by Ta-Nehisi Coates addresses a public issue by reacting to criticism of his book, which draws a controversial comparison between the Occupied West Bank and the Jim Crow South. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with societal issues related to race, history, and geopolitics.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but acknowledges a potentially harmful reaction to his work.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not address the privacy and dignity of others directly.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is a reaction to backlash rather than an explanation or dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it is a brief reaction without further engagement. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, as it is a reaction to criticism. [-1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing a personal reaction, but it does not elaborate on the responsibility or integrity of the platform.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.