Andrew Yang

The statement and image engage in public discourse by addressing the influence of money in politics and the impact of the Citizens United v. FEC decision. The tone is assertive, advocating for change in campaign finance laws.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to address perceived harm caused by the Citizens United decision, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   It promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting concerns about the influence of wealth in politics. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism of a Supreme Court decision without personal attacks. [+1]
4. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   It uses the platform to advocate for societal betterment by calling for campaign finance reform. [+1]