In reply to:
Tallest Man
@InYourEyesBab3
·
13d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
13d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of media misinformation and the implications of a President's call to revoke a news outlet's license, which are significant public concerns. The tone is critical of both media practices and political actions, suggesting a need for regulatory measures like the Fairness Doctrine.
- The statement does not directly harm others but criticizes media practices and political actions, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for media accountability. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others by focusing on media practices and political actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of media issues and the importance of free speech, aligning with the principle of promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of media practices and political actions without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight issues of media misinformation and political overreach, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by criticizing the call to revoke a media license, advocating for responsible use of influence. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.