Marianne Williamson

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 166
10/13/2024, 10:56:06 PM
X
In reply to:
Jackson Frank
@jackfrank_jjf
·
13d
@mmathog Lol, yeah, of the 3 candidates involved here, she’s the one to single out as a grifter. Definitely.
Michael Mathog
@mmathog
·
13d
@jackfrank_jjf Jill Stein isn’t even Jill Stein. She’s a grifter, she’s faking it.
Jackson Frank
@jackfrank_jjf
·
13d
Voting for Jill Stein is a vote for Jill Stein. Kamala would have to be ideologically similar to Stein rather than Trump for it to be a lost vote on her behalf. But she’s not, so.
Jennifer Taylor-Skinner
@JTaylorSkinner
·
14d
Hot take: People voting for Jill Stein already know it's a vote for Trump. That's kind of the point.

The statement is part of a conversation discussing political candidates and accusations of grifting, which constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues and political opinions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but is part of a conversation that includes accusations, which could be harmful if unfounded. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it is part of a thread that includes potentially harmful accusations.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement seeks clarification rather than engaging in personal attacks, which aligns with constructive dialogue. [+1]