Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement addresses a public issue concerning the legitimacy of overseas ballots and the resulting backlash, which involves military personnel and elected officials. This is a substantive engagement with a public issue, making it part of public discourse.
- The statement itself does not use harmful language, but it reports on a contentious issue that could potentially cause harm if not handled sensitively.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in cyberbullying or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it highlights a significant public concern that could foster dialogue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement reports on a disagreement but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By reporting on this issue, the statement uses its platform to inform the public, which can contribute to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly reporting on a public issue without bias or sensationalism. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.