Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement criticizes U.S. government officials for allegedly ignoring recommendations and misleading Congress regarding military aid to Israel, calling for immediate action based on U.S. law. It engages in public discourse by addressing U.S. foreign policy and legal obligations.
- The statement aims to hold officials accountable, which aligns with striving to do no harm by advocating for adherence to legal and ethical standards. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It accuses a public official of lying, which could be seen as disrespectful if not substantiated, potentially violating the principle of respecting dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism of public officials, which is constructive if based on evidence, but could be seen as a personal attack if not. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion on U.S. foreign policy, aligning with using influence for societal betterment if the claims are accurate. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.