Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of climate change and the role of oil companies, as well as the actions and positions of public figures like Kamala Harris. It highlights a perceived inconsistency in political positions over time, which is a substantive engagement with public issues.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it could be seen as critical of public figures.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on public actions and statements of public figures.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on highlighting a perceived inconsistency. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of public figures but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, as it is presenting a critique.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight a public issue, potentially contributing to public awareness and debate. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to engage in public discourse responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.