In reply to:
ℂ𝕙𝕣𝕚𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕒𝕟 𝕊𝕥𝕣𝕒𝕟
@khris_thomas
·
7d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
9d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of media suppression and the perception of public intelligence in political contexts. It challenges the notion that the average person is not prepared to understand complex political messages and emphasizes the importance of direct communication with the public.
- The statement does not use harmful language and instead promotes a positive view of people's intelligence, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by recognizing the intelligence of the public and the value of direct communication. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by countering a previous assertion without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight the issue of media suppression and the importance of direct public engagement, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by critiquing media suppression and responsibly using the platform to discuss public issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.