Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement critiques the editing practices of a media outlet during a public event, specifically focusing on the omission of certain words from a participant's question. It engages with issues of media transparency and integrity, which are public concerns.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on a critique of media practices, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in personal attacks or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By highlighting potential media bias, the statement encourages understanding and transparency, promoting empathy and compassion for the audience's right to full information. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of media practices without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by responsibly critiquing media practices and promoting transparency. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.