Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of voting rights for active duty service members and criticizing certain political figures for their actions related to election certification and voting rights. The tone is accusatory and critical, highlighting a perceived threat to democratic processes and the rights of service members.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful, particularly the use of 'traitors,' which may not strive to do no harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does question the dignity of the individuals mentioned by labeling them as 'traitors.'Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on criticism rather than fostering dialogue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in personal attacks by labeling individuals as 'traitors,' which is an ad hominem argument rather than constructive criticism.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to bring attention to a public issue, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by advocating for voting rights.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be more responsible by avoiding inflammatory language.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.