Jake Tapper

The statement addresses a public issue by discussing a political figure's decision not to participate in a debate, which is relevant to the civic dialogue surrounding elections and political accountability.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it could be seen as critical of a public figure's actions.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy and dignity by focusing on public actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on highlighting a perceived inconsistency.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of a public figure's actions, but it does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   There is no indication of acknowledgment or correction of mistakes in the statement itself.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its platform to inform the public about a political issue, which can be seen as contributing to the betterment of society by encouraging informed voting. [+1]
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech by responsibly reporting on a public figure's actions. [+1]