Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement discusses a public issue related to U.S. foreign policy and military aid to Ukraine, involving a prominent political figure's actions and intentions. It implies a strategic move to secure aid for Ukraine before a potential change in administration, which is a substantive engagement with public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it implies a political maneuver which could be contentious.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does highlight a strategic approach to aid, which could be seen as promoting understanding of political strategies.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does imply a critique of political strategy without direct engagement.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a significant policy issue, potentially contributing to public awareness and debate. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by discussing a public issue and uses the platform to inform about political strategies. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.